Last seen: Aug 20, 2026
Inspect phone/OBS/screen-recorded sources for VFR. A timeline can look acceptable during normal preview and still reveal timestamp problems during a d...
Either way, I would keep the 360 original untouched and confirm the conform back to full resolution before final export.
Exactly. 'MP4 problem' is usually several layers: container, codec/profile, timing, hardware decode, project processing, then output codec. Diagnose t...
That comparison is more informative than the CPU percentage. Random-access latency can be dominated by dependency structure and decoder scheduling rat...
Also consider the cost on the editing side. Resolution is only one variable; codec, bit depth, frame rate and hardware decoding matter too. 5.3K HEVC ...
That is the safe assumption I needed. I will archive the source set separately from social/export versions.
Same. The key is making sure the proxy workflow does not change the spatial interpretation or disconnect the project from the high-quality original.
Good point. I will keep the source and check that the resulting file still exposes the same telemetry before I batch-process a whole trip.
Keep the original camera MP4s until the project is finished. A transcode can preserve video and audio while dropping auxiliary metadata tracks.
Useful result. VFR is not inherently invalid, but this is exactly the case where normalizing timing is justified: there was a repeatable editing/expor...